Which aspect of Just War Theory emphasizes fighting with the right intentions?

The emphasis on fighting with the right intentions in Just War Theory is primarily captured by the concept of just cause. This principle asserts that a war can only be deemed just when it is initiated for a morally sound reason, typically to address a significant injustice or to protect innocent life. The intentions behind the war must be aligned with ethical standards, where the ultimate goals should promote peace and restoration rather than selfish gains or retribution.

In Just War Theory, having a just cause provides a moral framework that guides the decision to engage in warfare. A just cause not only dictates that there must be a legitimate reason for the conflict but also highlights the importance of intention; the motivations behind waging war should aim toward achieving justice and upholding human dignity. This perspective encourages reflecting on the moral implications of war, emphasizing that actions taken during armed conflict should strive for ethical outcomes.

Other aspects like competent authority, reasonable chance for success, and last resort address different dimensions of warfare. Competent authority relates to who has the right to declare war, reasonable chance for success ensures that the war is winnable, and last resort emphasizes that all other options must be exhausted before engaging in combat. While these principles are crucial to Just War Theory, they do not focus specifically on the